Moral, Social, and Political Philosophy Comparison Essay Example for Free

Moral, Social, and Political Philosophy Comparison EssayPhilosophy is a vast down argona to talk about. It is already known that philosophy involves the way people think about assorted things and how we questions things around us. The primary goal of philosophy is to obtain fellowship. To acquire and appreciation of knowledge and question knowledge is what philosophy is all about. Philosophy has been studied by philosophers for years and every philosopher has his or her own memorise on what philosophy means to them.Sometimes thither ar agreements and sometimes at that place are disagreements inside the philosophy community but with the debates being raised goes the rise to the knowledge that exists in philosophy. Through studies and debates philosophers produce found that there are many distinguishable types of philosophy. Three very important types of philosophy are seriouseous, social, and political philosophy. These three philosophy types are examined over and ove r by many philosophers. There is a lot of insight that can be learned by all three philosophy types.To get a more insight into moral, social and political philosophy one must compare and dividing line the differences and similarities in the three types. Moral philosophy is the philosophical study of moral judgments- value judgments about what is consummate(a) or base, just or injust, morally right or wrong, morally good or braggart(a) or evil, ,morally improper or proper. (Moore-Bruder, 2005) For example, if you see an older lady with a lot of groceries in her authorise then one would say it would be morally right to help the woman with her groceries.So it would be morally right to help those that are in need of help. Many philosophers study this type of moral philosophy. Asking questions about what makes something wrong or right morally. There are also three different ideas about morals which are skepticism, relativism, and subjectivism. Skepticism would be when people feel tha t having moral knowledge is non humanly possible. fundamentally we do not know what moral standards are. This means that any thing goes and there is no right or wrong belief.Relativism is the fact that different cultures have different beliefs and have differences on what is morally right or wrong. Subjectivist basically is what is right or wrong depending on what you might conceptualize as an individual person. Within moral philosophy there is also the use of egoism which is place your self-interest in front of everything else. The pursuit of pleasure is hedonism. (Moore-Bruder, 2005) Knowing how to seek put pleasure and bosom it is a description of this type of moral philosophy.There is also what is called social philosophy which goes hand in hand with moral philosophy. In social philosophy we bring up questions about social behavior. Basically how is the behavior of a person in different social settings? The legitimacy of different laws socially and the partition of revoluti on. There is the break down of social questions when it acquires to things like demographics, culture, and science. Social philosophy helps with understanding changes and different patterns within societies. Then you have what is called political philosophy.This means finding the best form of political existence. (Moore-Bruder, 2005) It helps give an understanding to the nature of political relationships and also authority. This means that there are questions rose like How do you control whether someone is to go to jail or pay a fine? Such questions like that bung into the political environment of philosophy. In political philosophy it is said that the philosopher Aristotle was an ethical naturalist and because of that he was sometimes viewed as the source of natural law political theory.(Moore-Bruder, 2005) That means that there a questions are answered finished and through natural law which is suppose to determine right or wrong. In political philosophy there are four kinds o f law which are pure(a) law, divine law, natural law, and human law. Now eternal law is the idea that God rules over everything and divine law puts people in the direction of his or her supernatural goal which is eternal joy. Natural law is the eternal law God which could be depict as happiness on earth or the natural goal of man. Last, human law is the laws that are made through the thoughts and ideas of man.These all show different aspects of political philosophy. Different rights one would have come along the lines of political philosophy. In conclusion, the depth of philosophy goes far beyond each of our understanding and that is wherefore studying the different aspects of philosophy gives those better insights into things that are questioned. Moral philosophy deals with what is morally right or wrong in different individuals eyes. Social philosophy deals with the social aspect of questioning social ideas and changes.Whether it is laws, science, culture, or demographics, thes e ideas can bring forth socially motivated questions. Last, political philosophy deals with the different political questions of what is right and wrong and how we determine this through political questioning. All three of these political philosophies are dissected through constant study and debate on what is really the basis of philosophy. ReferenceMoore, B. N. , Bruder, K. (2005(. Philosophy The Power of Ideas (6th ed. ). capital of Massachusetts McGraw-Hill (Packaged with PowerWeb). Retrieved January 14, 2009.